Ticker

6/recent/ticker-posts

Pakistani Expert Claims: Nur Khan AirBase under US Control

AI generated image for presentation purpose

The recent claims made by Pakistani security expert Imtiaz Gul regarding the Nur Khan Airbase have ignited significant controversy in Pakistan. In a widely circulated video, Gul asserted that the airbase, strategically located near Islamabad and Rawalpindi, is effectively under U.S. control, with even senior Pakistani military officials reportedly barred from accessing certain areas of the base. This assertion raises serious concerns about national sovereignty, military transparency, and foreign influence over critical infrastructure.

This airbase, formerly known as Chaklala Airbase, is one of the Pakistan Air Force's (PAF) most important airbases. It is close to the General Headquarters (GHQ) of the Pakistan Army and the Strategic Plans Division (SPD), which manages Pakistan's nuclear assets. The dual-use airbase serves both military and VIP civilian flights, being used by the President, Prime Minister, and visiting dignitaries.


What Did Imtiaz Gul Claim?

In a televised interview, Imtiaz Gul alleged that U.S. military personnel operate within the Nur Khan Airbase. He claimed that even high-ranking officials of the Pakistan Army are denied access to certain sections of the base. According to Gul, there exists a secret agreement between the U.S. and the Pakistani establishment that facilitates this arrangement. He further stated that the base reportedly receives frequent visits from U.S. aircraft, particularly C-17s and special operations planes, which are allowed to fly in without being questioned or inspected. Gul emphasized that the U.S. has established non-transparent operations inside the base, raising serious concerns about national sovereignty and military oversight in Pakistan.


Why is this Controversial?

Violation of Sovereignty

The idea that a foreign power operates inside a critical Pakistani military installation has led to public outrage and fear of compromised sovereignty.

Nuclear Security Concerns

Since the base lies close to Pakistan's nuclear command infrastructure critics fear that such presence could be a way to monitor or control Pakistan's nuclear program.

Lack of Transparency

Neither the Pakistan Armed Forces nor the civilian government have disclosed such a partnership if it exists. Raises concerns of military overreach or deep-state agreement without public or parliamentary oversight.

These revelations came just weeks after India's Operation Sindoor a retaliatory airstrike against terror infrastructure in Pakistan (including Nur Khan Airbase) which raises questions:

  • Was the U.S. aware of Indian plans?
  • Did U.S. aircraft leave or stay during strike?
  • Was U.S. presence a deterrent or complicating factor?
Strategic Relevance of the Aiebase for the U.S.
Though unconfirmed, experts suggest the U.S. might use the base for:
  • Surveillance and reconnaissance missions in Afganistan, Iran and China.
  • CIA and Special Operations logistics.
  • Evacuation hub for U.S. personnel in the region.
  • Monitoring of Pakistan's nuclear assets through proximity.


Historical Context of U.S. Use of Pakistani Bases
During the War on Terror the U.S. used several Pakistani Bases (like Shamsi Airbase) for Drone strikes and Intelligence gathering. After public outcry in 2011 (after the Osama bin Laden raid) most of these operations were formally shut down. It is believed that some covert agreement still allow limited U.S. access especially for intelligence and counter-terror coordination.

No, any official statement has been issued by Pakistan Air Force (PAF), Inter-services Public Relations (ISPR) and Ministry of defence. The silence has only fueled speculation and demands for a parliamemtary inquiry.

Motives Behind This

1. Military Aid Leverage- U.S. military and intelligence support often comes with access requirments.

2. Strategic Insurance- Pakistan's security establishment might use the U.S. presence as a deterrent against Indian strikes or internal instability.

3. Dependence on Surveillance Infrastructure- The U.S. might share satellite and drone intel in exchange for logistical bases.

4. Political Bargaining Chips- Pakistan's deep state may have made deals for concessions on IMF Loans, FATF blacklisting and diplomatic protection.


Geopolitical Implications

India: One could see this as hypocrisy: Pakistan allowing U.S. bases while accusing India of foreign alignments.

China: May view U.S. access to a base so close to its interests (e.g. CPEC routes, Xinjiang) as a security threat.

Iran: Concerned about U.S. aircraft stationed near its borders.


Conclusion

In conclusion, the controversy surrounding Imtiaz Gul's claims about U.S. control over the Nur Khan Airbase highlights significant concerns regarding Pakistan's national sovereignty, military transparency, and foreign influence. The allegations suggest a complex relationship between Pakistan and the U.S., rooted in historical alliances and strategic interests, particularly in the context of counterterrorism and regional security dynamics. 

 

You May Like These Post-







NOTE-  This is not any recommendation or advice to any Stock or Fund please consult your financial adviser before any investment. 
But my best thought 'DON'T DELAY INVEST TODAY'.


FOR OPEN DEMAT ACCOUNT CLICK ON THE LINK-




PLEASE FOLLOW, COMMENT AND SHARE TO OTHERS IF I ADD ANY VALUE.


Post a Comment

0 Comments